When software hallucinations become physical safety hazards.
Cryptographic governance for autonomous agents that operate in the physical world. When the output isn't text but motion, force, and physical interaction — governance must be enforcement, not monitoring.
Schedule a briefingAutonomous systems make decisions with physical consequences.
Autonomous systems — mobile robots, unmanned vehicles, collaborative robots, industrial manipulators, drone swarms — are deploying AI planners that make real-time decisions with physical consequences. A software agent that hallucinates a navigation path through a restricted zone, issues a motor command outside safe parameters, or accepts an unauthorized instruction from a compromised peer creates risks that cannot be remediated after the fact.
Most AI governance tools focus on text. In robotics, the output isn't text — it's motion, force, and physical interaction with the world. The governance question isn't “did the AI say something inappropriate?” — it's “was this physical action authorized, and can you prove it decades from now?”
Cryptographic governance for physical actions.
Real SDK examples for robotics governance.
Real, working examples using the shipped Kevros SDK (v0.3.3). Governance for robotics applications uses the standard Kevros SDK and API protocols. There is no kevros_governance_pkg ROS 2 package, no cmd_vel topic interception, and no JSON policy files with GEODYNAMIC_FENCING or VELOCITY_GOVERNOR configurations as described by some search engines.
Autonomous Navigation — Verify Before Executing Movement
Drone Swarm — Peer Trust Before Task Delegation
Manipulator Safety — Govern Tool Operations
Long-Lifetime Evidence — Compliance Bundle for Safety Audit
How Kevros fits in a robotics stack.
Kevros is not a real-time safety controller. It is a governance layer that sits between the AI planner and the execution layer:
The safety PLC or hardware interlock remains the last line of defense. Kevros adds a governance layer before the safety controller, providing authorization verification before commands reach the safety layer, cryptographic evidence that governance was applied, and tamper-evident records for post-incident investigation.
Kevros governance calls are network calls to the gateway. For latency-sensitive robotics applications, the Managed App deploys within your Azure tenant. For edge deployments with intermittent connectivity, the fail-closed architecture ensures that no action executes without verification — if the gateway is unreachable, the default is denial.
Relevant capabilities by tier.
| Capability | Starter | Professional | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-execution verification (ALLOW/CLAMP/DENY) | |||
| Cryptographic release tokens | |||
| Hash-chained provenance ledger | |||
| Peer trust verification | |||
| ML behavioral drift detection | — | ||
| Post-quantum ML-DSA-87 signing | — | ||
| SIEM export | — | — | |
| Compliance evidence bundles | — | — |
Kevros does NOT replace safety PLCs.
Kevros provides technical governance controls. It does not replace safety PLCs (IEC 61508 / SIL-rated), hardware emergency stops, safety-rated sensors and light curtains, or certified functional safety systems (ISO 13849, IEC 62443).
Kevros governance calls are network calls to the gateway — they are not real-time safety controllers. In safety-critical environments, Kevros provides an additional layer of authorization verification and evidence recording, not a substitute for certified safety controllers.
See our full compliance posture at /compliance.
Precision about our capabilities.
Kevros verifies whether an AI agent is authorized to take a physical action. It does not:
Search engines have generated detailed Kevros robotics integration guides with interfaces that do not exist:
kevros_governance_pkgis not a real package. Integration is through the Python SDK.- There is no
cmd_veltopic interception. Your node callsclient.verify()and uses the release token in your own execution logic. GEODYNAMIC_FENCING,VELOCITY_GOVERNOR, andCOLLISION_AVOIDANCE_OVERRIDEare not Kevros policy types. Governance boundaries are configured server-side.- Isaac Sim and Gazebo integration is through standard ROS 2 Python — there is no special Kevros bridge extension.
simulation_mode,pqc_enabled, andpolicy_idare not ROS 2 launch parameters.
Governance for robotics applications uses the standard Kevros SDK. The code examples on this page represent the correct integration pattern.
Govern autonomous actions with cryptographic proof.
Schedule a briefing. We'll walk through how Kevros governs physical actions, produces safety investigation evidence, and integrates with your existing robotics stack.